About Me

Name: uhangtight
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Kwame Goes To Denver.. but is he wanted?

Seems as though another one bites the dust.. Obama camp does not want Kwame in Denver.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Does Obama Believe...

  His own hype....?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's Actions: Just Along For The Ride

Obama is a charismatic persona created by the mainstream media and his 300 advisors.  Sure, he is easy on the eyes and when given well scripted words an oratorial master, but is he ready to make decisions that will decide the future of millions?  He has a limited resume, his resume pales in comparison to many others that sought the candidacy of both the Democrats and the Republicans.  Even Clinton's limited experience in the 1992 race was a concern for those that voted for him.  However, Clinton had been making decisions for the state of Arkansas as well as held various other positions (Arkansas State Attorney General) requiring action and decision making. 
 
The operative word is action.  What actions, beyond running for federal and state senate office, has Obama accomplished?  As one of the individuals involved in hiring the next POTUS, I have to ask myself what has he accomplished that was a long term success?  As an employor I would ask a prospective candidate:  "What projects were you involved in with your past employer(s) and how were they a success?  And, how was that success measured? What was your participation as a team member of the project, did you lead the team?  What did you do to make these projects a success"? Obama has not answered any of these questions, but has evaded any response beyond 'I was a community organizer', and that he was involved on a couple of pieces of legislation.
 
I cannot count being added to a piece of legislation by one of the 'co-authors' after the work is done as participating in its success.  This is just going along for the ride. I must count involvment from start to finish working tirelessly and consistently with the 'team'. Completing your task by sticking around to vote yes or no.  (You would think that if being added as an author of a piece of legislation you would vote yes, but alas, Obama has voted no on a piece of legislation that he co-authored; and I use the term 'co-authored' loosely.) 
 
I realize that he has showed up to work, this is apparent by his being marked present, but he has not fulfilled an honest days work as a public servant.   He has however, spent the majority of his time running for office, which thanks to his 300 advisors and big money machine (Soros) he has been very successful against Hillary.  I know that everyone speaks of the Clinton machine, how powerful and formidable that machine is, but part of that machine became divided and began working for Obama's primary campaign. Obama won the primaries and defeated Hillary, the Clinton-Machine.
 
If the team that was responsible for the Clinton-Machine divided and some of these operatives were working behind the Obama candidacy, is Obama really responsible for bringing down the Clinton-Machine as many on the left propose?  Or could it be that the operatives that left the Clinton machine brought that formidable machine down?  Can we even really give Obama the credit for bringing down the Clintons?  Was he all that material in this task or like everything else he has done during his public service: just going along for the ride?  Just the puppet of the ex-Clinton puppet masters?
 
Your guess is as good as mine, because the ex-Clinton-Machine knows what they're doing and they have kept this mystery man moving toward their ultimate goal: a resurgence to a position of power behind the POTUS.  This is their goal, and these POTUS makers were not going to gamble their power on Hillary.  She was too much of a lightening rod: you either hate her or love her, there is/was no inbetween.  So Obama is just cruisin' and along for the ride behind the ex-Clinton machine. 
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Russia Moves Into Georgia

Georgia, our ally, is now facing Russia invading its borders to 'bring' justice to the ethno Russian population within Georgia's borders.  The sovereignty of a nation loses its value because within the borders of that nation resides an ethnic group belonging to another sovereign nation.  If this is the new international precedent for nations, then United States you better wake up. 

At your southern border, your sovereignty has been invaded by the Mexican Military over the last few years reeking havoc along the border as well as now invading homes in Tucson holding an American Citizen hostage until local authorities arrived, not the first time, either.  How much longer before the incursions bring with them tanks or other tools of military action?  Mexico's another socialist oil rich country whose economy is fueled by drug cartels and oil.

Oil is the power behind any economy globally today.  Yet, the United States Congress both past and present has transferred the United States economic and military power not just to Middle Eastern Dictatorships, but to despots around the globe.  Do the liberals in congress (and some conservatives, too) realize that to transfer this wealth undermines our power and our economic stability within the global community?  This is either their well devised strategic plan to create a powerless populace in order to bring in a new government of socialist/totalitarianism or they are just plain stupid. 

Russia's new found wealth from drilling, refining and production of fossil fuels has empowered its economy as well as its military.  China is on the same path, drilling our own oil off of our own Florida coast, with the help of the despot ruling Cuba.  Drilling for our own oil off of our coasts is bad, but drilling of our own oil off of our coasts by our enemies is good.  By Congress not acting on an up or down vote this is exactly what they are implying.  The inaction speaks volumes:  'We want a United States with a weak economy and a weak military so that our enemies can control our destiny'.

Tell me Pelosi and Reid, where do you stand exactly?

Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Subterfuge Updated

Laura Ingraham's guest today, speaking to the security organizations within our government where malcontents are sabatoge the american foreign policy.  this to the detriment of the country and our culture.  Ken Timmerman's book Shadow Warriors is a must read. 

This confirms my suspicion that there are operatives in the State Department, Pentagon, CIA and FBI whose purpose has been to undermine the security of this nation due to their political malcontent.  Many of these operatives believe the illegitimacy of Bush's Presidency from the 2000 election; and have purposed to undermine his policies by undercut ting the administration in Iraq and now in Iran.









Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Subterfuge Inside Our Government

I never could understand those depression babies inordinate romanticizing of FDR. I am speaking about my Republican Mother, by the way.  Even today, when my mother refers to FDR her eyes turn glassy and her voice becomes soft and melodic. If you dare to speak even slightly derogatory about the great American leader of her childhood who single handedly ended the depression and World War II, well her glaze turns to fire and her voice turns to thunder.   

As a typical conversation: I’ve tried to convince my mother that the Great Depression could have ended without creating socialism; and probably would have ended faster, too.  Well, this is almost blasphemous because the great FDR couldn’t possibly have been wrong.  Yet, I can see her mentally twisting trying to justify the socialism that she definitely opposes.  She goes into a full tilt denial. 

Social Security was and still is the greatest con any politician has ever played against the American Citizen.  First, Social Security was devised in such a way that at the age of retirement, 65, you would begin to receive a ‘pension’ from the government. Never mind that they were going to tax you and thereby lower your standard of living to eventually pay for this ‘pension’. This potentially prevented the poorer citizens from being able to save the funds on their own in an interest bearing account at a bank or other institution.   

Secondly, they also knew that the majority of those sold this bill of goods would never live to collect.  In the 1930’s the average lifespan was to the ripe old ages of 58 for men and 62 for women.  Is this not the perfect scam or con game?  This is just one example of the socialist treachery of the FDR Administration. I won’t even begin to discuss the other socialistic programs initiated by that same Administration.   

My parents, ever since I can recall, have been Republican.  I can recall their voting habits, since I was five.  They vote party line for any and all elections.  I find it amazing the legacy of FDR has remained seemingly untarnished, even in their eyes, considering my parents hate with a passion the mess with Social Security, various other socialistic entitlement programs and the Unions impact on business.   

As time passes, however we have the advantage of hindsight and documents published years later.  Apparently, FDR had a pattern of appointing communists to various positions within his Administration.  This communist comrade list includes Alger Hiss (State Department), Harry Dexter White, Lauchlin Currie (both working at the Department of the Treasury) and Owen .  Careful analysis shines the light on Harry Dexter White.  If Harry had not had the ear of FDR we may never have been forced to go to war with Japan.  It was Harry’s influence that caused FDR to not meet and negotiate with the Premier of Japan during November 1941.   Harry was an undercover agent for the Soviet Union.  The great success that the Soviet Union had infiltrating these important positions in the past and their successful influence on the President’s decision-making is frightening.   

Let’s transport ourselves to the current day and the current state of affairs at Foggy Bottom
WASHINGTON - Several hundred U.S. diplomats vented anger and frustration Wednesday about the State Department's decision to force Foreign Service officers to take jobs in Iraq, with some likening it to a "potential death sentence."

In a contentious hourlong town-hall meeting, they peppered officials responsible for the order with often hostile complaints about the largest diplomatic call-up since Vietnam. Announced last week, it will require some diplomats — under threat of dismissal — to serve at the embassy in Baghdad and in reconstruction teams in outlying provinces.

And, this little debacle regarding the Islamic Saudi Academy happening in Virginia:

In a study released last month, the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom — a watchdog group created by Congress eight years ago — recommended that if the Saudis could not at least clean up the textbooks in use at the ISA, the State Department should close the school pursuant to its powers under the Foreign Missions Act.

Nobody expected Foggy Bottom to take swift and certain action. Nevertheless, it was disappointing to see early signs that the State Department intends to ignore the commission’s findings. The official pushback came in the form of
a leak to the Washington Post, published in Monday’s edition.

Now I realize that some leaks are intended, however during the current Bush’s administration there have been various ‘leaks’ from the state department and the pentagon regarding crucial and vital information on the war on terror.  Literally, these events have cut the administration at the knees in its attempt to fight this war.  The biggest mistake this administration made was not rooting out the diplomats that disagree and work against their policies. 

If I were to undercut the CEO of the company that I work for because I did not agree with his policies of running the company (which I don’t agree with by the way), well I would find it difficult to find a job anywhere in the private sector.  This is exactly what these public servants, and I use that word ‘servants’ loosely, have done.  I do my job to the best of my ability and keep my opinions to myself.  I can hope for a new CEO or I can quit my job. 
I work for a medical care provider and leaking crucial information can get me thrown in jail and fired.  I dare say these diplomatic leaks were treasonous.  Yet this administration does nothing to counter this situation.  If infiltration by the enemy seeking the downfall of this country occurred so easily during FDR’s presidency; and at such high levels, how can anyone think that today this is not happening as well? Considering the destruction Clinton’s presidency had on the CIA and the FBI, it would be prudent to flush the dregs from the system. They need to clean up the state department and the pentagon; I say fire those that refuse to go to Iraq.  Flush out the treasonous leaks and try them in a court of law.  Get the traitors out, now!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Diversity As A Strategy of Defeat for Conservatives


Watching the actions of the ACLU, La Raza and various other nefarious organizations impact this country and its citizenry negatively is frightening.  I am tired of listening to those who shrug it off as well that is part of our great nation's history.  Another part of our history, is knowing when to revolt.  I'm not speaking to violence, there are other methods to use for sure.  How can we revolt and change this path of impending doom? 
Well, we were making headway through talk radio....But now the liberal revolt is working feverishly against conservative radio. 

By impeding conservative speech through radio.  We are losing our freedoms through the disguise of diversity.  Yes, we must be diverse and respect diversity in others.  Not however using diversity as a strategy to change your political opposition's method's for presenting their position; and not as a strategy to prevent your political opponents ability to exist.  Opposing political viewpoint's freedom of speech and their pathway to freedom of speech should be frightening to both liberals and conservatives.  It does not appear, however,  that the liberals care about freedom of speech for conservatives.  If they do it does not show in their actions.  That is quite evident by the debate tactics both past and present.  The most recent is the boycott of FOX News on the basis that they are bias, which shows they are banking on the fact that no one watch's FOX News.  Have they seen the numbers?

The logical response would be to want to present your views to a group so sequestored by this bias network.  Compete for the right to speak on the network and get your views and opinions out to those watching this network.  But, alas, what does the liberal movement do?  The liberals response to bias?  Let's be bias in return.  

When allowed to run unincumbered talk radio is more successful if conservative.  The liberals can't figure it out and the reason is?  They do not understand or respect real freedom of choice, capitalism and/or competition.  Competition means that someone will eventually lose.  Capitalism means that there will be those that are poor and need assistance and there will be those that are very rich.  Free choice means that the majority of the consumers may not choose your product. 

Will the liberals will win?  Will the liberals win this battle.  They will if it is left up to the likes of the ACLU and Geroge Soros.  Stop George Soros and we can at least have a level playing battle field.  And, don't kid yourself, this is a battlefield.     George Soros has a large group of resources that have developed a strategy.  They have even progressed to the point of implementing that planned strategy.  Where are the conservatives?  Once again, they lack leadership.  The kind of leadership that isn't busy putting out fires, but is on the cutting edge of strategy development and implementation. 

Conservatives??


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is Bush Asleep At The Wheel

I ask myself this question: is Bush awake?  When I placed my vote for Bush, it appeared that I was voting for a leader that was steadfast in his beliefs.  He was a competent leader, more so than those in opposition from the democratic party. 

What makes a good leader?  First, and foremost, he can't loose steam.  He must stay awake.  It is as if Bush has scales over his eyes preventing him from seeing what is happening.  The Harriet Meyers fiasco was not the first 'sluggish' leadership endeavor, but hopefully this steadfast loyalty to Gonzalez will be his last.

It is as if Bush needs to be shaken before he develops a strategy.  Whether that strategy is for defining the course of action for Iraq and explaining it to the country, or selecting subordinate leadership for the Cabinet or office of the Attorney General.   Rather than develop a strategy of communication of his plans or his strategy for Iraq and other viable policies (Social Security), Bush remains behind the eight ball.  Rather than being on the edge of the wave he is consistently putting out fires.

You cannot be a successful leader if you are always reacting to events.  A great leader will be proactive, develop a strategy and communicate that strategy effectively.  Bush needs to wake up from behind the wheel of guiding this country and take a position of leadership and be proactive.  He doesn't have much time, and this country needs him to wake up!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Queen of Corruption

Well San Fran Nan is going to stop the corruption and bring transparency to the hallowed halls of Congress.  Fireworks and choir singing, exit stage left Pelosi.  The new reign of the party of fairness, transparency and all that is good and right began. 

Apparently, not fearing the media blitz on her slight of hand, the Queen of Corruption conveniently left out of the new House Bill raising the minimum wage the Island of American Somoa.  Now, we know these poor lower income workers are much better off than let's say, those living in Puerto Rico or California for that matter.  

Lucky for the Del Monte Company, headquartered in San Fransico, the company has a tuna plant that employs a significant number of the Island's inhabitants.  I guess they were hoping to not increase their employees hourly wage on the Island of American Samoa and made a visit to San Fran Nan a.k.a. Queen of Corruption.  There in her office a little deal was made, and transparency was born. 

Oh, until some of those sneaky vile Republicans decided to make a stink on the floor of the house asking if it would be appropriate to take the Island of American Somoa out of the bill being discussed on the floor this morning.  Now, San Fran Nan has back tracked and apparently your tuna will cost more.  I mean after all how else will poor old Del Monte cover the costs they will incur from having to raise the minimum wage? 

Yes a new era has begun, well let's hope it is only a two year nightmare that has begun. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

United We Stand

Life and life more abundantly, that is what Christ has come to give. This Nation was created by God and for God's purpose. Yet, there are those that would deny this spending their lives distorting this truth; and rewriting history to ensure this truth is denied. This Nation was created as an evangelical tool for the world. Look how God has blessed other Nation's through the blessings He gives when this Nation honors Him.

Now there is an enemy preparing itself to rule the world through oppression. This Nation stands in its way. If, you are a patriot, how can you not see the danger that waits? If, you are a patriot, how can you not feel the outrage to stand against this danger? Patriotism, hearing that word a lot lately. It is a word void of meaning. Words are merely a methodology used by Democrats to manipulate their agenda there is no substance. Heard former Governor of Iowa, Tom Vilsack (D) use the word patriotism on Hannity & Colmes. The word rolled off his tongue so easily, but it was void of meaning. No substance and it didn't move me; I didn't rise up with love and humble pride and ready to stand united after hearing him speak.

We are the United States no more. There is not that once held commonality between us that brings us together. We are crumbling from within and our enemy roars like a toothless lion. Waiting for the moment to come in and reap the bounty of our self-destruction. Will we give our enemy that opportunity?

I am not a fearful person, but this thought grips me with sorrow. A deep felt hunger for a Nation that will rise up to its greatness as one and defeat their enemies. A Nation that understands its destiny and that destiny is not to worry if the rest of the world loves us but to honor the One who has blessed us.  The United States, united with one purpose and one goal.  No longer focused in a narcisstic self-indulgent mindset.  Whining childishly this doesn't feel good anymore and I am bored with this so make it stop or make it go away now, but a resolution to win and win big. 

I can't imagine that the majority of my country men and women do not know how to win or survive.  Because that is what we are in a fight for our survival.  I guess I have always been a fighter and a survivor.  My mom said it wasn't very feminine to be a tom boy but I loved it; and see now that is the core within me, as well as in my faith in God's healing, that helped me survive breast cancer. 

It is hard for me to imagine there exists in this Nation a majority of individuals that do not know how to win.  But are childishly bickering over what the definition of the term win is!   I am concerned that I am really in the minority and the liberal thought is the majority. 

I am afraid that if this Great Nation does not turn itself around it will wonder so far down that path of self destruction it will not return. I am not afraid to fight for it and I am no longer a spring chicken. But, I do not want to see my Country, this Great Nation in a bloody fight engaging the enemy from within its borders. The reason? I am afraid the left will be standing there not with me fighting to save this Great Nation but with the oppressor my enemy.  

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »